THEORY: Linear vs Nonlinear Displacement
Just a quick reminder on some of the limitations of Linear Elastic Analyses
Linear
Elastic Analyses produce wrong results (to differing and variable degrees) when:
- Defining ν >= 0.49 to simulate the incompressibility found in elastomers. It is easily verified that the resulting stress-strain law is singular as ν approaches 0.5. If it is attempted to enforce incompressibility in an approximate manner by using a high bulk modulus, there is not only a risk of singularity, but there is also a risk of volume locking. Special techniques have to be employed to overcome the difficulties that arise as a result of the incompressibility or near incompressibility constraint
- When the total elastic strain at any gauss point exceeds 5% (later blog)
- When the rotation of ANY element exceeds 0.5 degrees
- Assuming an arbitrary rigid body rotation (φ) using small displacement assumptions, then φ=0.5° gives about 1% non-physical elastic strain which limits the maximum rotation to nearer 0.05 degrees in reality
- This is really important for:
- GAPS
- CBUSH
- BARS
- RBEs (eg rotation about independent node enlarges hole diameter!)
- Offsets
- CWELD / CFAST
Large Displacement On:
Large Displacement Off (showing the non-physical elastic strain being calculated):
More to come!