TIPS: MSC Nastran Notepad++ Language Filter

TIPS

MSC Nastran Notepad++ Language Filter

Notepad++ 

As a lot of us use Notepad++ for deck editing, so colleagues have created an MSC Nastran format xml language file that can be implemented to highlight keywords, comments etc.

 Download the file from:
userDefineLang.xml

 To use, simply copy to your AppData/Roaming folder typically found in:
C:\Users\Name\AppData\Roaming\Notepad++

 By default the filetypes are set to BDF and DAT files. Or alternatively you will find it in the Language menu under NASTRAN.
There is also format for Patran PCL code as well as Patran session file format.

 More to come!

Popular posts from this blog

THEORY: Implicit vs Explicit - Introduction

Image
Implicit Structural Solutions   Development of the finite element method began in earnest in the middle to late 1950s for airframe and structural analysis. By the late 1950s, the key concepts of stiffness matrix and element assembly existed essentially in the form used today. NASA issued a request for proposal for the development of the finite element software NASTRAN (developed by  MSC.Software) in 1965. Steady State or Static Equilibrium (ΣF = 0) Force  = Stiffness x Displacement In actual practice, inverting the stiffness matrix to solve the system of equations for displacement is highly inefficient. MSC Nastran uses a more efficient matrix decomposition procedure rather than the matrix inversion method. It is necessary to iterate the solution to be able to solve non-linear problems (using methods such as Newton-Raphson shown below, etc.) for many real-world problems. These nonlinearities can be associated with: Contact Material Behaviour ...
Read more

Customer Spotlight: Midlands Simulation Group

Image
Hierarchical  Structure Analysis Comparing an I-beam or box section girder with a solid beam of same dimension shows that the girder is much lighter - but just as stiff. Similarly, a sandwich panel of differing core thickness, but identical skin provides equally light – but ~40 times more stiff. It turns out that making an I-Beam girder out of lots of little girders improves the efficiency further - and most likely better able to withstand impact. This is a "hierarchical" or cellular structure. The Eiffel Tower is a classic example of a 3rd degree hierarchical structure. Even with its relatively poor quality iron, it is more resource efficient than many a modern skyscraper. An attractive manufacturing route is that of bonding of layers (laminating), forming to shape and then inflating to stiffness. The layers are not bonded everywhere: on inflation, the un-joined regions separate and form internal struts or membranes (miniature honeycomb or I-beams) where the outer layer...
Read more